Raising partner’s 1m opening isn’t very high on our priority list – we don’t like suggesting playing in a minor suit to begin with, and partner’s “suit” could be only 3 cards. We’re never going to raise partner’s minor when we have a 4‑card major, since we want to find out if we have a major-suit fit. We’re not going to raise partner’s minor with a balanced hand – unless it’s so strong that we have slam interest – because we prefer to play balanced hands in notrump. So minor-suit raises are rare, but they do happen, and when they do we need to have good agreements in place.
The trend in modern bridge is to design our bidding systems so that the better our hand, the lower we can keep the auction. This is a departure from the thinking of the original bidding architects, so a lot of the “standard” bidding from the ’50s and ’60s has been reworked. One of the most common examples of this is “Inverted” minor-suit raises. In the olden days, a raise to 2m was weak (6‑9 HCP or so) and a jump-raise to 3m was invitational. There wasn’t a bid for a forcing raise; you had to make up some forcing call and support partner later. This is unacceptable to the modern bidding theorist – the forcing raise is the most important, and it should be able to keep the bidding as low as possible. The common solution to this problem is to define 1m‑2m as forcing – invitational or better – and 1m‑3m as weak. You can see why they call it “inverted” – the meanings of 2m and 3m have basically been swapped. But by having 2m be forcing, it can include both the invitational and the GF raises. We lose the 1m‑2m raise with the 6‑9 HCP hand, which is awkward occasionally; many of these hands aren’t right for a 1m‑3m raise, so they get stuck with no good bid. As is often the case, we are willing to sacrifice partscore accuracy to improve our game and slam bidding.
Both the 2m and 3m raises are alertable. The standard agreements are that Inverted Minors are on by a passed hand (obviously 2m is Invitational, not Invitational+, so opener can pass it) and off in competition (meaning that if an opponent overcalls or doubles, 2m is not forcing; good raises cuebid or use Jordan).
What Hands Raise Opener’s Minor?
There are a few general rules about raising opener’s minor suit:
- Never raise opener’s minor when you have a 4+ card major. Bid 1M instead.
- Don’t raise a minor when you have a balanced hand (unless you have slam interest). Bid the appropriate level of notrump.
- You usually want 5‑card support to raise opener’s minor. You can raise with 4‑card support much more freely when opener’s suit is diamonds than clubs, since a 1♦ opening will be on a 4+ card suit 95% of the time.
- Don’t abuse the 3m raise. It’s there for weak hands that have great support. If 1NT is a reasonable alternative, give it strong consideration.
The 3m Raise
It’s important to have a clear definition about what this 3m raise looks like, especially since it takes up so much space – you want it to be pretty specific. It does not encompass all hands that would have raised to 2m playing “standard” minor-suit raises. In fact, most of these hands are not appropriate for a 3m raise, because this raise should be preemptive in nature.
The most common strong hand that a 1m opener will have (i.e., a hand that might want to bid a game opposite a weak raise from responder) is the balanced hand with 18‑19 HCP (the hand that was planning to rebid 2NT after 1m-1M). When not vulnerable, I like to define the 3m raise as a hand so weak it does not want partner to bid 3NT if she has the balanced 18‑19 hand. That means about 0‑6 HCP. When vulnerable, I like the 3m jump to show enough strength that it does want partner to bid 3NT if she has the balanced 18‑19 hand. Obviously, shape, and suit quality need to be taken into account any time we are preempting.
Examples:
Partner opens 1♦.
♠ 5 ♥ 752 ♦ QJ863 ♣ JT42
3♦ if not vulnerable, pass if vulnerable.
♠ J2 ♥ Q64 ♦ KJ853 ♣ Q65
1NT. Too strong for 3♦.
♠ J984 ♥ 4 ♦ A9762 ♣ 853
1♠. Don’t raise a minor with a 4-card major.
♠ 942 ♥ 4 ♦ J9543 ♣ 9762
Not nearly enough for a vulnerable 3♦ bid, but acceptable non-vulnerable, especially at favorable vulnerability.
♠ 3 ♥ A54 ♦ K8743 ♣ 8743
3♦ when vulnerable. 1NT if not vulnerable.
The 2m Raise
An “Inverted” 2m raise shows an invitational or better hand with no 4‑card major and good support for opener’s minor – usually 5+ cards. When our suit is a minor, our goal contract is always 3NT. That means we can’t upgrade too much for shortness, since we are hoping to play in notrump, even though we have a fit. So invitational values means 10‑12 HCP.
Balanced hands are usually better off bidding notrump. By raising opener’s minor responder is strongly suggesting that the final contract belongs in opener’s minor – though of course 3NT is a very common landing spot. If the hand looks like it belongs in notrump, strongly consider another bid.
Examples:
Partner opens 1♦.
♠ 2 ♥ K65 ♦ AQ872 ♣ Q743
2♦. A textbook minimum 2♦ bid.
♠ K4 ♥ AK ♦ KQ972 ♣ AJ75
2♦. There is no upper limit to an Inverted 2m raise.
.
♠ Q64 ♥ K53 ♦ QJ92 ♣ QJ8
2NT. With a balanced hand, 2NT is a better bid than 2♦.
♠ A7 ♥ KQ6 ♦ KJ94 ♣ AJ82
2♦. This hand is too strong for any notrump bid, since slam is quite possible.
♠ QJ65 ♥ 9 ♦ AQ7532 ♣ K9
1♠. Don’t raise a minor with a 4-card major.
♠ J3 ♥ Q96 ♦ KQ842 ♣ J54
1NT. Too weak for 2♦, too strong for 3♦.
♠ 8 ♥ AQ7 ♦ AJ962 ♣ KQ53
If you play 3♠ as a Splinter, that’s the best bid. Minor-suit splinters show very good hands – at least 15 HCP. If you don’t play splinters here, bid 2♦.
Continuations After 1m-2m
The most important thing your partnership must agree upon is how high the 2m forces you. My preference is that it is forcing to 3m. This means that a bid of 3m by either partner is not forcing (showing a minimum), but that you cannot stop below 3m – meaning all bids at the 2‑level are forcing. Many people play that the force is through 2NT (i.e., you can stop in both 3m and 2NT). Both agreements are playable, but I think the flexibility of being forced to 3m outweighs the advantages of being able to stop in 2NT. Responder shouldn’t really have a hand that wants to stop in 2NT anyway – those hands usually bid 2NT immediately instead of making a 2m raise. As always, having an agreement with your partner that you both know and remember is much important than having the “right” agreement. The discussion here assumes that the force is through 3m; if you have a different agreement, you will need to modify your responses a little.
Keep in mind that our primary goal in all minor-suit auctions is getting to 3NT. After an Inverted 2m raise we have two basic missions:
- Determine if we have game values. The 2m raise is Invitational+, so either opener or responder needs some extra values to get us to game.
- Make sure 3NT isn’t a stupid contract. This means we don’t have a short suit that is wide open, where the opponents are likely to be able to cash the first 5 tricks.
At any point, the weakest bid by either opener or responder is 3m, since that can be passed. With a bad minimum hand – even with a balanced hand and xxx in the minor – opener should bid 3m to put on the brakes. With a minimum raise, responder’s second bid is usually 3m, limiting her hand.
Balanced Hands
Opener has two possible ranges of balanced hands: 12‑14 and 18‑19. For now, it’s not essential to differentiate them, since all the bids at the 2‑level are forcing. 2NT shows a reasonable balanced hand with stoppers in the other suits (especially the majors). It could be any strength. 3NT by opener takes up so much space that we want it to be very specific. It needs to be a balanced 18‑19, but it should be the worst balanced 18‑19, meaning usually 18 HCP and a poor fit – usually a 3‑card suit, often a 4333 hand.
If opener lacks a stopper somewhere, making his hand wrong for a 2NT rebid, he can bid naturally at the 2‑level. This doesn’t have to be a 4‑card suit – you’re not looking for a major-suit fit, since responder has denied a 4‑card major. It just shows some values in that suit. You generally want to bid up the line, so bidding 2♠ usually means opener doesn’t have a heart stopper.
Examples:
Partner raises your 1♣ opening bid to 2♣.
♠ Q83 ♥ AJ75 ♦ Q8 ♣ AJ32
2NT. A good minimum balanced hand (you plan on bidding game, even if responder has a minimum) with stuff in all the other suits.
♠ Q874 ♥ QJ83 ♦ J5 ♣ AQ2
3♣. Opener’s weakest action is 3m. This doesn’t promise any extra length in his suit, just a terrible minimum with no game interest if responder is invitational.
♠ KJ82 ♥ KQ5 ♦ QJ2 ♣ AQ6
3NT. The worst good hand – 18 HCP but 4333 and only 3 cards in your suit.
♠ 74 ♥ KJ82 ♦ AQ2 ♣ K853
2♦. A decent balanced minimum, but no spade stopper, so you can’t bid 2NT. Bid suits where you have values up the line.
♠ KQ78 ♥ AJ3 ♦ A8 ♣ KQ84
2NT. 2NT is forcing, so it can include strong hands like this. If responder bids 3♣ showing a minimum, you will bid 3NT; this shows a better hand than a direct 3NT. If responder bids 3NT, showing more than a minimum, you can raise to 4NT to show your extra values.
Unbalanced Hands
Opener can splinter after an Inverted 2m raise if he has a hand strong enough to force to game (15+ HCP) by jumping in a new suit. After 1♦‑2♦, bids of 3♥, 3♠, and 4♣ are splinters. Remember that 3NT is still a likely spot (when responder has values opposite your shortness), so you need full HCP values (or even a little extra) to force to game. With a weaker hand, opener bids naturally at the 2‑level (just like she does with a balanced hand missing a stopper).
Examples:
Partner raises your 1♣ opening to 2♣.
♠ 5 ♥ KJ53 ♦ AJ6 ♣ AQJ82
3♠. A perfect splinter.
♠ 8 ♥ AQ5 ♦ KJ5 ♣ QJ9765
2♦. Not strong enough to splinter.